Saterstad et al v. State of Nevada et al
Plaintiff: Martin D Saterstad and Richard Lee Saterstad
Defendant: Clark County District Attorneys Office, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and State of Nevada
Case Number: 2:2016cv01702
Filed: July 18, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 26 defendants' motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 29 plaintiffs' motion to extend time be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 10 plaintiffs' amended complaint be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
December 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER denying 17 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER denying 22 Motion to Stay Case; ORDER denying 24 Motion to Extend Time; Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
April 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER adopting 12 Report and Recommendation; FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs' Fifth Amendment due process claim be, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
March 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER that claims may proceed (see order for details). FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall issue summons to Defendants. Plaintiffs shall have twenty days to furnish the required USM-285 forms to the U.S. Marshal. REPORT AND RECOM MENDATION Recommending to dismiss with prejudice 5th Amendment Due Process Claim Re: 10 Amended Complaint. Objections to R&R due by 3/20/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: 285 to P - JM) Modified on 3/6/2018 to correct Judge who signed the Order (DKJ).
January 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's claims against the state of Nevada and the prosecutors at the district attorney's office be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
December 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting 6 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER granting 7 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Amended Complaint deadline: 1/8/2018. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION denying 2 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Martin D Saterstad, denying 3 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Richard Lee Saterstad, denying 1 Motion /Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Richard Lee Saterstad, Martin D Saterstad. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs claims against the State of Nevada and the prosecutors at the District Attorney's Office be dismi ssed with prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 9/27/2017. Plaintiff's claims against Clark County and the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department are dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 10/13/2017., Payment of filing fees or IFP due 10/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/13/2017. (copy of complaint sent to P)(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: IFP to P - JM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Saterstad et al v. State of Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clark County District Attorneys Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin D Saterstad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Lee Saterstad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?