Keen et al v. Omni Limousine
| Ronald Keen and Robin Mooney |
| Omni Limousine |
| 2:2016cv01903 |
| August 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| James C. Mahan |
| George Foley |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 47 plaintiffs' motion for circulation of notice be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/2/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Motion Approving Settlement of Plaintiff's FLSA Claims. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the stay be, and the same hereby is, LIFTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 14 plaintiffs' motion for circulation of notice be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs shall have leave to file an amended motion for circulation of notice within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this order. Thereafter, briefing will proceed in conformity with Local Rule 7-2(b). Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 35 the parties' Stipulation and Order to Continue the Stay is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status hearing is scheduled for 6/23/17 at 9:30 a.m. in Las Vegas Courtroom 3A. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 27 Plaintiffs' Motion to Lift Stay and 28 Motion for Briefing Schedule are denied as moot. Plaintiffs may refile their motions if necessary following the 60-day stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation for Extension of Time 27 Motion to Lift Stay and 28 Motion for a Briefing Schedule. Responses due by 4/21/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 21 Anthony L. Hall, Esq. and Ricardo N. Cordova, Esq.'s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant Omni Limousine is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Omni Limousine must retain new counsel if it i ntends to continue to litigate this matter. Omni Limousine shall have until 3/31/17, to retain new counsel and advise the Court of the same. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add the last known address of Omni Limousine to the civil docket. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER granting ECF No. 8 Omni Limousine's Motion to Stay as follows: 1) Case stayed until such time as the Court deems it appropriate to lift the stay, and 2) The statute of limitations shall be tolled until the Court determines that a stay is no longer necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/18/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
15
ERROR: Document file in wrong case. CORRECTION: Document to be filed in correct case. Document 15 is terminated as filed in error. ORDER. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on 10/26/2016 (RFJ).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
