Mccracken et al v. Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada et al
| CE Mobile Installs, Ltd. and Thomas Mccracken |
| M. J. Maynard, Regional Transportation Commission of Southern Nevada and Carl Scarbrough |
| 2:2016cv01920 |
| August 12, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| George Foley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 33 Motion to Dismiss. The Court of the Clerk is instructed to close this matter accordingly. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 2/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER granting 19 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint as to the First Amendment retaliation claims. The Monell claim shall be deemed void even with the filing of the Amended Complaint. That claim shall not proceed in this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall DETACH and FILE the First Amended Complaint attached to the motion at ECF No. 19-1. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 7 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
