McCoy v. Capital One Financial Corporation
Plaintiff: Tia Camille McCoy
Defendant: Capital One Financial Corporation
Case Number: 2:2016cv01928
Filed: August 9, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Richard F. Boulware
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Granting 37 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER. The deadline to file dismissal papers is EXTENDED to 8/17/17. Any further request for extension must be filed as a motion or stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
July 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to submit an early neutral evaluation statement by noon on 7/5/17 directly to the undersigned's box in the Clerk's Office. The Clerks Office is INSTRUCTED to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff, and to also email her a copy at TMcCoy179@aol.com. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 28, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, by 4/4/17, a stipulation with five dates on which the parties are available for an early neutral evaluation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 8 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 McCoy's complaint be DISMISSED with leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order is enter to Amended Complaint to avoid dismissal with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons on the Amended Complaint. The court will issue a screening order on the Ame nded complaint and address the issuance of Summons at that time, if applicable. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). The Clerk of Court is directed to serve a copy of this Order upon Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
November 16, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER re 6 ENE Notice. IT IS ORDERED that the Court declines to set an early neutral evaluation at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCoy v. Capital One Financial Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One Financial Corporation
Represented By: Erica J Chee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tia Camille McCoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?