Jackson v. Williams et al
| Attorney General State of Nevada and Williams |
| Robert Jackson |
| 2:2016cv02033 |
| August 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 8 the application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 9 the motion to reopen is DENIED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/30/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall send petitioner a blank form for an application to proceed in forma pauperis for incarcerated litigants and a blank § 2254 habeas corpus petition form with instructions. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 the application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice to petitioners commencement of a new action in which he either pays the filing fee in full or submits a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a signed financial certificate and a statement of his inmate account. The clerk of the court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/6/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
