Sebeck-Marquez v. Colvin
Kathleen J. Sebeck-Marquez |
Carolyn W. Colvin |
2:2016cv02043 |
August 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Gloria M. Navarro |
George Foley |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 31 the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full to the extent it is consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 25 Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is DENIED, and 30 D efendant's Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on 9/30/2019 to correct signature date (ADR). |
Filing 33 ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorneys Daniel Adam Lazar and Urmila Rajagopal Taylor terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 29 ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation for Extension of Time. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 27 ORDER Granting 26 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Plaintiff's Opening Brief. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/16/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 20 ORDER Granting 19 Stipulation for Second Extension of Time to File the Certified Administrative Record and Defendant's Answer. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 12/13/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 18 ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File the Certified Administrative Record and Defendant's Answer. Carolyn Colvin's answer due 12/7/16. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 11/8/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 9 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file her Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than September 23, 2016. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 09/16/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sebeck-Marquez v. Colvin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin | |
Represented By: | Urmila Rajagopal Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathleen J. Sebeck-Marquez | |
Represented By: | Hal Taylor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.