Goldsmith v. Aargon Collection Agency, Inc. et al
| Eugene Goldsmith |
| Aargon Collection Agency, Inc. and Armand Fried |
| 2:2016cv02066 |
| August 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
115
ORDER granting 114 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, (ECF Nos. 48 , 52 , 64 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 ), as to Landeros, the Hegners, Pili, Mercado, Jackson, Phillips, and Serrata are GRANTED. Plaintiffs' FDCPA claims, as well as their related state law claims, are hereby dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend in accordance with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 56 ), as to Smith is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Smith's claim under the NDPTA is dismissed with prejudice, and Smith's claim for civil conspiracy is dismissed without prejudice with leave to amend. Smith's FDCPA claim regarding the COJ Violations and the four untimely Writ of Execution Violations is dismissed without prejudice, and Smith's timely FDCPA claim concerning the fifth writ of execution and claim for abuse of process survive. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss, (ECF No. 60 ), as to Ch atman is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Chatman's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint, (ECF No. 103 ), is GRANTED consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Landeros, the Hegners, Chatman, Pili, Mercado, Jac kson, Phillips, Serrata, and Smith shall file their amended complaints within twenty-one (21) days of this Order. With respect to Landeros, the Hegners, Chatman, Pili, Mercado, Jackson, Phillips, Serrata, failure to file an amended complaint by this time shall result in the Court dismissing their claims with prejudice and closing the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER that 108 Stipulation to Engage in Mediation and Set Depositions is DENIED as unnecessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting 101 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 4/30/2018. Motions due by 5/30/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
97
ORDER that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule IA 10-5, the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to any documents filed under seal. To the extent any aspect of the stipulated protective order may conflict with this order or Local Rule IA 10-5, that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby superseded with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER. On May 4, 2017, the undersigned ordered the parties to file a joint statement as to the schedule by which these cases should proceed by May 11, 2017. Docket No. 70 . The parties have failed to comply. The Court again ORDERS, this time by May 16, 2017, that the parties file the joint statement as outlined in Docket No. 70 . Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER re 47 Order Consolidating Cases. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a joint statement as to the schedule by which these cases should proceed. In that joint statement, the parties shall include a deadline by which to file any motions for consolidation or bifurcation of trial. That joint statement shall be filed by May 11, 2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
45
OMNIBUS TRANSFER ORDER. FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs' attorney in these cases, Vernon Nelson, must file a copy of this Order in any future Fair Debt Collection Practices Act case he files against Aargon Collection Agency, Inc., and Arm and Fried in this district. A Motion Hearing re 17 MOTION to Consolidate and 27 Motion to Bifurcate is set for 5/4/2017 09:00 AM in LV Courtroom 7C before Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER Granting 33 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Stephen A. Watkins substituted in place and stead of James Kevin Schultz for Armand Fried. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation to Extend Deadline re 17 MOTION to Consolidate Cases. Responses due by 2/22/2017. Counsel is further ORDERED to immediately file in the other impacted cases a notice that the stipulation was granted in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/14/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
