Bank of America, N.A. v. Twilight Homeowners Association et al
Plaintiff: |
Bank of America, N.A. |
Defendant: |
Daly Property Management, Homeowner Association Services, Inc., RBBE Real Estate Investments, LLC and Twilight Homeowners Association |
Case Number: |
2:2016cv02208 |
Filed: |
September 20, 2016 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Office: |
Las Vegas Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Cam Ferenbach |
Presiding Judge: |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Nature of Suit: |
Real Property: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
March 30, 2019 |
Filing
77
ORDER Denying 47 Motion for Summary Judgment, Granting 51 Motion for Summary Judgment, and Denying 74 Motion to Amend Default Judgment. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/30/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
December 10, 2018 |
Filing
73
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Bank of America, N.A. and against Defendants Daly Property Management and Homeowner Association Services, Inc. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 12/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
October 18, 2018 |
Filing
63
ORDER Granting 62 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 47 , 51 Motions for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 11/2/2018. Replies due by 11/16/2018. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
August 23, 2018 |
Filing
58
ORDER Granting 57 Motion to Withdraw Attorney. Attorney Annie J Kung terminated. Defendant Daly shall have until 9/24/18 in which to retain substitute counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Rich Baron - ADR)
|
June 30, 2018 |
Filing
54
ORDER Granting 52 Stipulation to Stay Briefing Schedule Pending Outcome of Settlement Conference re 47 and 51 Motions for Summary Judgment. The Parties shall have an extension of 21 days after the settlement conference up to and including 10 /18/2018 to file Responses to BANAs and the HOAs Motion for Summary Judgment and shall have 14 days thereafter to file the Reply to the Responses. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
June 18, 2018 |
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation for Extension of Time (Second Request). Motions due by 6/18/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
March 23, 2017 |
Filing
33
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that this case is administratively STAYED pending exhaustion of all appeals of Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank, No. 15-15233 (9th Cir. Aug. 12, 2016). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DE NIED without prejudice with leave to refile within twenty-one days after the stay is lifted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, beginning on 9/20/17, the parties must file a joint status report updating the Court on the status of this case every one-hundred and eighty days. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/23/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
December 5, 2016 |
Filing
25
ORDER Granting 15 Stipulation to Extend Time re 13 Motion to Dismiss. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 12/5/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?