Bank of America, N.A. v. Ridgeview Homeowners Association, Inc., et al
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| A Scimitar LLC, Nevada Association Services, Inc. and Ridgeview Homeowners Association, Inc. |
| A Scimitar LLC |
| A Scimitar LLC |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| Alex A. Diaz and Sonya R. Diaz |
| 2:2016cv02211 |
| September 20, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| James C. Mahan |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER Granting 93 Stipulated/Consent Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff Bank of America and against Scimitar and the HOA. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the HOA Sale did not extinguish the Deed of Trust. The Deed of Trust therefore remains a valid encumbrance on the Property. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
89
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 85 parties' joint motion for stay pending settlement be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the instant action is STAYED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall submit a joint stipulation to dismiss pursuant to settlement agreement or a joint status report on or before 1/17/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER Granting 83 Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 80 Motion. Replies due by 11/26/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER Granting 75 Motion to Remove Attorney from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 65 BANA's motion for reconsideration be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED, consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court's 10/26/2018, 63 Order be, and the same hereby is, VACATED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER granting 68 Motion to Substitute Attorney. John Henry Wright is substituted in place and stead of Zachary P. Takos as counsel for A Scimitar LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) (Main Document 69 replaced on 2/6/2019 - nef regenerated) (MMM).
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER granting 66 Stipulation re: 65 Motion. Responses due by 2/11/2019. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER that 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; that 38 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; that 37 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Scimitar shall prepare a proposed judgment consistent with this order and submit it to the court within thirty (30) days of the filing of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER that 27 Motion for Extension of Time to Serve and for Service by Publication is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
