Timmons v. Clark County Detention Center et al
Plaintiff: Tolavius Timmons
Defendant: Clark County Detention Center and NAPH Care
Case Number: 2:2016cv02229
Filed: September 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER denying 68 Motion to Dismiss; Motions for Discovery and Summary Judgment due by 12/9/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 66 Motion to Extend Time. Dispositive Motions due by 11/26/2019. All other deadlines remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER that Plaintiff is to file a notice of changed address by 7/29/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER that Defendant Williamson's 19 Motion to Dismiss is Denied and Williamson's 32 Motion to Strike is Granted. NaphCare's 42 Motion to Dismiss is Denied. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Re: 52 Letter. It is not clear why this letter was filed with the Court and settlement discussions are generally confidential. As such, the Court SEALS and STRIKES this letter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/6/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
October 25, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Second Attempt of Service of Process. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to furnish to the United States Marshal the required USM-285 form. The Clerk's Office shall send the 9 second amended com plaint and a copy of this order to the United States Marshal Service for service on Defendant Naphcare. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - 285 form and Order mailed to Plaintiff; 9 second amended complaint and this Order hand delivered to USM - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Timmons v. Clark County Detention Center et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clark County Detention Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NAPH Care
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tolavius Timmons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?