Williams v. Clark County School District
| Shaquinta Williams |
| Clark County School District |
| 2:2016cv02248 |
| September 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
ORDER Denying 50 Motion to Vacate Judgment and Denying 55 Motion for Leave to File Additional Evidence. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 24 defendant Clark County School District's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendant Clark County School District and against plaintiff Sha quinta Williams. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court shall seal ECF Nos. 24 -1, 27 -5, 27 -6. Within 14 days of entry of this order, the parties shall file properly redacted, publicly accessible versions of these documents. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation to Extend Time re 24 MOTION for Summary Judgment . (Responses due by 10/25/2017., Replies due by 11/15/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER Granting 22 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions. ( Motions due by 9/20/2017.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/25/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation to Extend Time to File Dispositive Motions. ( Motions due by 9/6/17.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on 7/21/2017 to reflect correct due date (ADR).
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Dispositive Motions (First Request). Motions due by 8/16/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/20/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation to Reschedule Early Neutral Evaluation. ( Early Neutral Evaluation reset for 4/12/2017 09:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr.) Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Clark County School District | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Clark County School District | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shaquinta Williams | |
| Represented By: | Robert P Spretnak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
