Ditech Financial LLC v. Haddad et al
| Ditech Financial LLC |
| Grapevine Villas Homeowners' Association and Resources Group, LLC |
| 2:2016cv02287 |
| September 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
ORDER denying 42 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER denying 48 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER denying 66 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER granting 67 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER denying 74 Motion to Dismiss. Plaint iff Ditech Financial LLC's wrongful foreclosure claim against defendant Grapevine Villas Homeowners' Association is DISMISSED as moot. On or before June 28, 2019, defendant Grapevine Villas Homeowners' Association shall show cause in writing why its third party claims against Alessi & Koenig LLC should not be dismissed. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER granting 71 Stipulation; Re: 67 Motion for Summary Judgment, 66 Motion for Summary Judgment, Responses due by 5/24/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 60 Stipulation; Re: 48 Motion for Summary Judgment, 42 Motion for Summary Judgment, Responses due by 4/12/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
58
ORDER granting 57 Stipulation; Re: 48 Motion for Summary Judgment, 42 Motion for Summary Judgment, Responses due by 3/29/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting 55 Stipulation to Extend Time Re: 42 Motion for Summary Judgment and 48 Counter Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for deadlines. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER granting 49 Stipulation; Re: 42 Motion for Summary Judgment, Replies due by 3/4/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER granting 40 Stipulation to Set Aside 39 Order on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER denying 35 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER to advise the parties that discovery motions filed in this case will not be briefed according to the default schedule outlined in Local Rule 7-2(b), but will instead be briefed on shortened deadlines absent leave from the Court, see Local Rule IA 1-4 (the Court may alter the local rules). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Motion to Lift Stay of Case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER STAYING CASE pending issuance of mandate from Ninth Circuit. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/30/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
