Bally Gaming, Inc. v. Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. et al
Bally Gaming, Inc. |
Aristocrat Leisure Limited, Aristocrat Technologies, Inc. and Video Gaming Technologies, Inc. |
2:2016cv02359 |
October 10, 2016 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
James C. Mahan |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER Granting 46 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 43 ORDER Granting 42 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/24/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 19 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties' 17 Stipulation for Extension of Time is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/05/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 9 Unopposed Motion to Extend Time (First Request) re 1 Complaint. Defendants' answer due 12/4/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/31/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.