Pathak v. Lobel's of New York, LLC A New York Foreign Corporation et al
| Anshu Bharat Pathak |
| Rose Fraum, Stephen Fraum, Evan Lobel, Leon Lobel, Mark Lobel, Stanley Lobel and Lobel's of New York, LLC |
| 2:2016cv02480 |
| October 24, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 21 Request for Dismissal with Prejudice Against All Defendants. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, no later than 3/28/2017, either (1) a joint proposed discovery plan; or (2) a status report explaining why a proposed discovery plan should not be filed at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/21/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER. Each non-governmental party is required to file a certificate of interested parties concurrently with its first appearance in a case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(b)(1); Local Rule 7.1- 1(c) (amended effective May 1, 2016 Plaintiff must file a certificate of interested parties no later than 11/10/16.() Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/26/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
