ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does
Plaintiff: ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant: John & Jane Does
Case Number: 2:2016cv02520
Filed: October 31, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 DEFAULT JUDGMENT. The Court awards statutory damages to the Plaintiff against Defendant Brian Davis, in the amount of $1,500.00. The Court further awards to the Plaintiff against Defendant Brian Davis, fees and costs, including reasonable attorneys' fees, in the amount of $4,717.50. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
April 6, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 37 OMNIBUS TRANSFER ORDER. This case is transferred to Judge James C. Mahan and Magistrate Judge Nancy Koppe for all further proceedings. All future filings for this case must bear case number 2:16-cv-02520-JCM-NJK. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pla intiff must file a copy of this order in any future case that it files in this district that is related to the Mechanic: Resurrection copyright. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
November 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 26 Magistrate Judge Koppe's report and recommendation be, and the same hereby is, ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all defendants except for Brian Davis be, and the same he reby are, dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 30 plaintiff's motion for entry of clerk's default be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: the clerk will enter default against only defendant Brian Davis, but not against any other defendant. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER. The pending 25 motion to quash subpoena is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
April 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: (1) The clerk of the court shall FILE a copy of the Omnibus Transfer Order in this case and REASSIGN Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe to this case for all further proceedings. (2) All future filings in this action shall reference the Case No. 2:16-cv-02520-JCM-NJK. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/18/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John & Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ME2 Productions, Inc.
Represented By: Charles C. Rainey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?