Scott v. Hoopes et al
| Nicolas Scott |
| Corporation of the President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and Ethan Hoopes |
| 2:2016cv02646 |
| November 17, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
65
ORDER granting 64 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 46 Motion to Remove Attorney David T. Blake from Electronic Service List. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER that 34 Stipulation to Stay Discovery and Motion Practice Pending Mediation Between the Parties is DENIED. A hearing on 29 Defendants' Motion to Quash is set for November 7, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER Granting 25 Stipulation Regarding Production of Defendant Ethan Hoopes' Email and Non-Waiver of Attorney Client Privilege. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
