Phillips v. Williams et al
Petitioner: James Curtis Phillips
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Case Number: 2:2016cv02709
Filed: November 23, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that the 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER that the petitioner must no later than 30 days from the entry of this order file notice of his current mailing address. If the petitioner does not comply with this order within the time allowed the court will dismiss this action. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
February 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER Granting Respondents' 12 Motion to Partially Dismiss. Ground 8 is Dismissed from the 8 Amended Petition as procedurally defaulted. Respondents have 60 days from the date this Order is entered to file an Answer to the remaining c laims in the Petition. Petitioner has 30 days following service of Respondents' Answer to file a Reply. Petitioner shall respond to this Order within 30 days to either (1) indicate that the address on record with the court remains valid or (2) provide the court with a current mailing address. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER that the Clerk shall electronically serve the 8 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and a copy of this Order. The Clerk of the Court shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Attorney General of the State of Nevada as counsel for respondents. Respondents shall file a response to the 8 Amended Petition including potentially a Motion to Dismiss within 60 days of the date of this Order. The hard copy of any additional state court record exhibits shall be forwarded to the staff attorneys in Reno. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phillips v. Williams et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Curtis Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?