Lilly v. Citigroup, Inc.

Lilly v. Citigroup, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Catherine Lilly
Defendant:	Citigroup, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2016cv02780
Filed:	December 5, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge:	James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 26, 2017	Filing 13 ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
April 19, 2017	Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 9 the parties' stipulation to arbitrate and to stay case pending arbitration be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the p arties shall show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order as to why this matter should not be dismissed rather than stayed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 defendant's motion to compel arbitration be, and the sa me hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 10 the parties' stipulation to extend time be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 26, 2017

Filing 13 ORDER Granting 12 Stipulation of Dismissal without Prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/26/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

April 19, 2017

Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 9 the parties' stipulation to arbitrate and to stay case pending arbitration be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART consistent with the foregoing. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the p arties shall show cause in writing within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this order as to why this matter should not be dismissed rather than stayed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 defendant's motion to compel arbitration be, and the sa me hereby is, DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 10 the parties' stipulation to extend time be, and the same hereby is, DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/19/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lilly v. Citigroup, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Citigroup, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherine Lilly
Represented By:	David H. Krieger
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?