Carr v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Department et al
| Stephen Carr |
| Francis Kleehammer, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department and Kyle McKnight |
| 2:2016cv02994 |
| December 27, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER Granting 28 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Defendants' 23 Motion for Summary Judgment is moot. The deadline to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order due 9/28/2017 is vacated. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting in part Defendants' 7 Motion for Partial Dismissal and for More Definite Statement. Plaintiff Stephen Carr shall file an Amended Complaint within 30 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/25/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file, no later than March 31, 2017, either (1) a joint proposed discovery plan; or (2) a status report explaining why a proposed discovery plan should not be filed at this time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 03/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
