ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does
Plaintiff: ME2 Productions, Inc.
Defendant: John & Jane Does
Case Number: 2:2017cv00049
Filed: January 5, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 41 DEFAULT JUDGMENT. The Court awards statutory damages to the Plaintiff against Defendant Sergio Uribe, in the amount of $1,500.00. The Court further awards to the Plaintiff against Defendant Sergio Uribe, fees and costs, including reasonable attorneys fees, in the amount of $5,092.50 Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
April 10, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Plaintiff's 38 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiff shall prepare and file an appropriate judgment for the court's signature within 21 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
November 16, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe's 17 Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part. All Defendants except for Sergio Uribe are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
June 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that all Defendants except Defendant Sergio Uribe be SEVERED and DISMISSED without prejudice.To the extent any subpoenas remain outstanding in this case, they are hereby QUASHED. Plaintiff is ORDERED to promptly serv e a copy of this order on the recipients of any outstanding subpoenas and shall file a proof of service by 6/20/2017. Plaintiff is ORDERED to promptly serve a copy of this order and report and recommendation as well as the order and report and reco mmendation issued concurrently in Case No. 2:17-cv-00724-JCM-NJK, on any defendant who has not yet appeared and shall file a proof of service by 6/20/2017. Objections to R&R due by 6/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
April 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER that Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint with the identities of Defendants by 4/20/2017. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation of dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ME2 Productions, Inc. v. Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John & Jane Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ME2 Productions, Inc.
Represented By: Charles C. Rainey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?