Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| Cactus Creek at Mountains Edge Homeowners Association, Nevada Association Services, Inc. and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC |
| 2:2017cv00066 |
| January 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| George Foley |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER. I THEREFORE ORDER Wells Fargo and SFR to file a stipulation of dismissal or a status report by 4/24/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/31/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER Lifting Stay. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the parties shall meet and confer. Within ten days after the meet-and-confer, the parties shall file a proposed scheduling order. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/2/2019., Case stay lifted. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER STAYING CASE. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this case is administratively STAYED. Once the proceedings in the United States Supreme Court in Bourne Valley Court Trust v. Wells Fargo Bank and Saticoy Bay LLC Series 350 Durango 104 v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage have concluded, any party may move to lift the stay. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 04/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
