JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Defendant: Fidel H. Pajarillo, Rancho Las Brisas Master Homeowners Association and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
Case Number: 2:2017cv00074
Filed: January 9, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 64 JUDGMENT by DEFAULT. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's 63 Motion for Default Judgment against Fidel H. Pajarillo, relating to real property located at 4856 La Cumbre Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89147; Parcel No. 163-21-818-047 is GRANTED. Pajarillo, any successors and assigns, have no right, title or interest in the Property and that SFR is the rightful title owner. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER that SFR shall file a motion for default judgment with a proposed judgment attached thereto on or before 1/24/2020. If SFR does not file a motion for default judgment it shall file a status report regarding its cross-claim on or before January 1/24/2020. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 1/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
October 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER Re: 55 Joint Status Report. The parties shall have a final extension until 11/30/2018to file a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice or a judgment as directed by the district judge. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
August 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER Re: 52 Notice of Settlement. The settling parties shall have until 10/1/2018 to either file a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice, or a joint status report advising when the stipulation will be filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
June 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 40 Motion for Summary Judgment. The HOA's 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted and SFR's 39 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted. SFR shall prepare and submit to the court a Proposed Judgment within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
July 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Granting 27 Motion for Service by Publication. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 28 Motion to Enlarge Time to Serve is Granted and the time for service is extended by an additional 60 days from the date of this order is entered to allow SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC (SFR) to effectuate service by publication. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/13/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
April 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that the 18 Joint Motion to Stay Litigation is NOT APPROVED and is DENIED. The following discovery plan and scheduling order deadlines shall apply: Discovery due by 10/4/2017. Motions due by 11/3/2017. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/4/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
February 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that 13 defendant's demand for security costs, be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. shall post a cost bond in the amount of $500.00 or make a cash deposit of $500.00 as to SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC within seven (7) days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Finance - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.
Represented By: Matthew David Lamb
Represented By: Holly Priest
Represented By: Abran E. Vigil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fidel H. Pajarillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Rancho Las Brisas Master Homeowners Association
Represented By: Robert S. Larsen
Represented By: Wing Yan Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC
Represented By: Diana Cline Ebron
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?