US Bank National Association et al v. Villa Vecchio Ct Trust et al
| US Bank National Association and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| Absolute Collection Services, LLC, Foothills at Southern Highlands Homeowners Association and Villa Vecchio Ct Trust |
| 2:2017cv00143 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
ORDER. It is therefore ordered that Vecchio's 105 motion for summary judgment is denied. It is further ordered that Vecchio's 106 motion to reopen discovery is denied. It is further ordered that Plaintiffs' 107 moti on for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordinglyin Plaintiffs' favor and against Vecchioand close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/9/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER Granting 110 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule on Dispositive Motions and Motion to Reopen Discovery re 107 Motion for Summary Judgment, 105 Motion for Summary Judgment, 106 Motion to Extend/Shorten Time. Responses due by 7/28/2023. Replies due by 8/25/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/21/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER Granting 108 Stipulation Extension of Time re 106 Motion to Extend Time. IS IT HEREBY ORDERED That the briefing deadlines for the Motion to Reopen shall be aligned with the briefing deadlines for the motions for summary judgment a s follows: 1) That the deadline for Wells Fargo to file an opposition to the Motion to Reopen shall be extended from July 14, 2023 to July 21, 2023; 2) That the deadline for Villa Vecchio to file a reply in support of its Motion to Reopen shall be extended from July 21, 2023 to August 18, 2023 Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 7/12/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ALZ)
|
|
Filing
104
ORDER GRANTING ECF No. 103 Stipulation for Extension of Time (Second Request). Parties shall file motions for summary judgment by 6/30/2023. Responses/Oppositions due by 7/21/2023. Replies due by 8/18/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/31/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER granting ECF No. 101 Stipulation for Extension of Time (First Request). Motions for summary judgment remain due by 6/9/2023. Responses due by 7/7/2023. Replies due by 7/28/2023. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/1/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CJS)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER approving ECF No. 87 Stipulation re ECF No. 80 Motion to Vacate. Replies due by 7/21/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/15/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER approving ECF No. 84 Stipulation re ECF No. 80 Motion to Vacate. Responses due by 7/7/2020. Replies due by 7/14/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER granting ECF No. 81 Stipulation. Responses to ECF No. 80 Motion to Vacate are due by June 23, 2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 64 ) is denied, and judgment is entered against Defendant Villa Vecchio on its Counterclaims (ECF No. 52 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Summar y Judgment (ECF No. 65 ) is granted, and the Court holds that the Deed of Trust survived the association foreclosure sale because the super-priority lien was satisfied by the borrower prior to the HOAs foreclosure sale. IT IS FURTHER ORD ERED that Plaintiffs' remaining claims as set forth in its Complaint (ECF No. 1 ) are dismissed as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, there being no further claims as against any remaining party, the Clerk of the Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER approving ECF No. 60 Stipulation to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third and Fourth Claims for Relief. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting ECF No. 58 Stipulation to Extend Time re ECF No. 53 Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 7/19/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/11/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting ECF No. 47 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Absolute Collection Services, LLC and The Foothills at Southern Highlands Homeowners Association without Prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/15/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting ECF No. 45 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Oppose ECF No. 43 Motion to Dismiss. Response due by 10/15/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER directing Clerk to serve a copy of this certification order on the Nevada Attorney General (mailed 01/18/2017). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 01/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
