Johnson v. Smith et al
| Lausteveion Johnson |
| James Cox, James Dzurenda, Jo Gentry, Mesa, Rhoshonda Smith, Summers, Valdez, Sr. Brian Williams and Johnny Youngblood |
| 2:2017cv00156 |
| January 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 63 Defendants' Motion for Sanctions is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 68 Plaintiff's Countermotion for Sanctions is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 69 Plaintiff's Motion for Or al Arguments is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 73 Plaintiff's Motion for Teleconference is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 84 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/26/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 85 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 84 Motion for Sanctions. Responses due by 12/29/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 12/18/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 55 Defendants' Motion for Order to Show Cause, is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has until 5:00 PM on 8/14/2020, to either pay the outstanding filing fees owed as required by the Court's 24 Ord er, revoking Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status, or show cause as to why Plaintiff is wholly unable to pay the outstanding filing fees in this matter. Failure to pay the outstanding filing fees by 8/14/2020, or show cause warranting excusal of payment will result in dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 53 Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference is Granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties may jointly stipulate to request a settlement conference after a decision is issued on the pending dispositive motions (ECF Nos. 34 - 35 ) to the extent that they believe it would be productive. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 5/13/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER granting 45 Motion to Continue; Settlement Conference reset for 4/2/2020 at 09:30 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts. Settlement conference briefs are due by 4:00 p.m. on 3/26/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts on 1/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 19 plaintiff Lausteveion Johnson's Motion Requesting Issuance of Summons is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of court must issue sealed summonses for defendants Jo Gentry and Johnny Youngblood, comp lete USM-285 forms for those defendants, and deliver the summonses, USM-285 forms, and a copy of 7 the amended complaint to the United States marshal for service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER advising plaintiff that if he wishes to serve defendants Gentry and Youngblood, he must file a motion requesting issuance of summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/2/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
