Smith v. One Nevada Credit Union et al
Plaintiff: Joseph Smith
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and One Nevada Credit Union
Case Number: 2:2017cv00193
Filed: January 23, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting 31 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own fees and costs. The Motion to Dismiss [ 9] is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
September 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Granting 29 Stipulation of Dismissal. IT IS HEREBYORDERED that all claims against defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. are DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear it own fees and costs. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
May 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER Granting 22 Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
April 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER Granting 18 Stipulation to Extend Time re 9 MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint. (Replies due by 4/14/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 29, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER Granting 11 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 9 MOTION to Dismiss re 1 Complaint. (Replies due by 4/7/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
February 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER Granting 5 Stipulation Extending Time. One Nevada Credit Union answer due 3/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 2/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. One Nevada Credit Union et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
Represented By: Jennifer L Braster
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: One Nevada Credit Union
Represented By: Santoro Whitmire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Smith
Represented By: Miles N Clark
Represented By: Matthew I Knepper
Represented By: David H. Krieger
Represented By: Sean N. Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?