Lopez v. XL Inc.
| Rosalyn Lopez |
| XL, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv00442 |
| February 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER granting ECF No. 57 Stipulation for Dismissal of All Claims with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/4/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER that the Settlement Conference scheduled for 1/24/2019 is VACATED and CONTINUED to 2/14/2019 at 9:30 AM in LV Chambers, Room 3071 before Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen. The deadline for chambers to receive the confidential settlement conference statements, currently due 1/17/2019 is VACATED and CONTINUED to 2/7/2019 at 4:00 PM. All other instructions contained in the Order Scheduling Settlement Conference (ECF No. 53 ) shall remain in effect. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting ECF No. 45 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to Reply to ECF No. 34 Motion for Summary Judgment. Reply due by 6/1/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER granting ECF No. 38 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to respond to ECF No. 34 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Response due by 5/4/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER granting ECF No 35 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to Respond to Defendant's motions for summary judgment re disability claim and retaliation claim (ECF Nos. 33 and 34 ). Plaintiff's responses due by 5/1/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER granting ECF No. 31 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File and Respond to Dispositive Motions (Second Request). Dispositive Motions due by 3/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER that defendant shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 06/16/2017. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 06/02/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lopez v. XL Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rosalyn Lopez | |
| Represented By: | Trevor J. Hatfield |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: XL, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
