Gonzalez v. Clark County, ex rel et al
Plaintiff: David Gonzalez
Defendant: David Aspiazu, Clark County, ex rel, Erin Hood and The Clark County Sheriff's Office
Case Number: 2:2017cv00607
Filed: February 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER TO PRODUCE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/16/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM, Warden of Three Lakes Valley Conservation Camp - ADR)
October 7, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER to Produce Plaintiff for 11/6/2019 Hearing. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: USM - JM)
September 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER granting 83 Stipulation; Settlement Conference reset for 11/6/2019 at 10:00 AM in LV Room 3005 before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. The settlement conference statements shall be received in my chambers, located on the third floor at 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Ste. 3005, Las Vegas, Nevada not later than 4:00 p.m., October 30, 2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
June 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 80 ORDER Referral to Pro Bono Program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Pro Bono Liaison - JM)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER: Gonzalez's Objection to the Court's Written Order on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint 59 is OVERRULED, and the magistrate judge's order denying leave to amend 56 is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
October 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER granting 68 Motion to Extend Time; Motions due by 11/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER granting 57 Motion to Extend Time; ORDER granting 58 Motion to Extend Time; Discovery due by 9/17/2018. Motions due by 10/17/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
March 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 50 ORDER Re in Camera Production of Internal Affairs. Defendants Production of Documents for In Camera Review is filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) Modified on 3/27/2018 (JM).
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Compel; ORDER granting 40 Motion to Extend Time. FURTHER ORDERED that on or before March 28, 2018, Defendants must submit to chambers the internal affairs file. Discovery due by 6/15/2018. Motions due by 7/16/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
February 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on 39 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery and 41 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines is scheduled for 1:00 PM, 3/14/18, in Courtroom 3D. Plaintiff is ordered to appear telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
February 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER granting 41 Motion to Extend Time; Re: 39 Motion to Compel. Responses due by 2/13/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
November 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER denying without prejudice 31 Motion to Compel; Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/13/2017. Discovery due by 2/28/2018., Motions due by 3/29/2018., Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/30/2018. FURTHER ORDERED that the stay in this case is lifted. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
November 8, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 36 Motion Regarding the Court's Order of 11/2/17 is GRANTED and this case is removed from the Inmate Early Mediation Program. This case was referred to the pro bono program for the limited purpose of representation at the Inmate Early Mediation Program. This case is now removed from the pro bono program. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/6/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
September 13, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel; Case stayed for 60 days. This case is referred to the Pro Bono Liaison. This case is referred to the Inmate Early Mediation program, and the court will enter a subsequent order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Pro Bono Liaison - JM)
August 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 21 Defendants' Motion for Leave to Take Deposition of an Incarcerated Person. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER denying 13 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Clark County, ex rel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Aspiazu
Represented By: Noel E Eidsmore
Represented By: Robert W Freeman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Clark County, ex rel
Represented By: Noel E Eidsmore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Erin Hood
Represented By: Noel E Eidsmore
Represented By: Robert W Freeman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Clark County Sheriff's Office
Represented By: Noel E Eidsmore
Represented By: Robert W Freeman, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?