Stephens et al v. Comenity, LLC
| Christopher Gulley and Jennifer Stephens |
| Comenity, LLC |
| 2:2017cv00670 |
| March 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
ORDER granting ECF No. 88 Stipulation of Dismissal of the Individual Claims of Plaintiff Jennifer Stephens Only. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER granting ECF No. 72 Motion for surreply and denying ECF No. 75 Motion to Strike. Proposed surreply due 12/1/2017. NO FURTHER FILINGS WILL BE ENTERTAINED WITH RESPECT TO THAT MOTION. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDERD that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule IA 10-5, the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined in order, with respect to any documents filed under seal. To the extent a ny aspect of the stipulated protective order may conflict with this order or Local Rule IA 10-5, that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby superseded with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 06/01/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
