Bank of New York Mellon v. Vegas Property Services, Inc. et al
| Bank of New York Mellon |
| Shadow Springs Community Association and Vegas Property Services, Inc. |
| 2:2017cv00776 |
| March 17, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER granting ECF No. 99 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Allison R. Schmidt of Ayon Law, PLLC as counsel in place and stead of John Henry Wright and The Wright Law Group, P.C. The Motion to withdraw as counsel ECF No. 94 is DENIED as moot and the hearing on that motion is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER setting a hearing for 1/7/2019 at 9:30 A.M. in LV Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe regarding ECF No. 94 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Vegas Property Services. Any response to the motion is due by 12/26/2018 and the reply is due by 12/28/2018. Withdrawing counsel to serve copy of order on Vegas Property Services, and shall file a proof of service by 12/19/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting ECF No. 86 Stipulation to Withdraw and Rebrief Motions for Summary Judgment (ECF Nos. 83 , 84 ). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER granting ECF No. 80 Motion to remove attorney Timothy P. Elson from the Electronic Service List on behalf of Shadow Springs Community Association. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/8/2018.; (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER temporarily staying this action until resolution of the certified question in Nev. S. Ct. Case No. 72931; denying without prejudice ECF Nos. 44 , 63 Motions for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/26/2018. Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER that ECF No. 71 Motion to Serve Crossdefendant Frink Family Trust by Publication is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 4/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER granting ECF No. 56 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file reply in support of ECF No. 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. Reply due by 12/27/2017. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting ECF No. 47 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File Response to ECF No. 44 Motion for Summary Judgment. Response due by 12/6/2017. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's ECF No. 16 Motion to stay discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/2/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
|
|
Filing
7
CERTIFICATION ORDER. Clerk directed to serve a copy of this certification order on the Nevada Attorney General (mailed to AG 03/21/2017). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 03/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
