Howard v. Cox et al
Reginald C. Howard |
Lt. M. Adams, R. Aranas, J Borrowman, A. Buencamino, S L Clark, Greg Cox, James Dzurenda, J. Gentry, Lt Grover, Mesa, C Porter, SQT Sanchez, D. Tristan and D Willett |
2:2017cv01002 |
April 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Jennifer A. Dorsey |
Peggy A. Leen |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 204 ORDER Granting 203 Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/29/2024. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RJDG) |
Filing 188 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, Denying Defendant's Motion to Supplement, and Denying Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees [ECF Nos. 156 , 163 , 165 ]. See order for details. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/14/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 164 ORDER Granting 157 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendant to respond to 155 Bill of Costs and 156 Motion for Attorney Fees. Responses due by 8/11/2023. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/27/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - RGDG) |
Filing 122 ORDER TO PRODUCE Reginald C. Howard. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/16/2023. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; USMS - DC) |
Filing 102 ORDER to Produce Reginald C. Howard. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/29/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 96 ORDER to Produce Reginald C. Howard. Hearing set for 6/14/2022 at 2:00 PM. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/10/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC) |
Filing 84 ORDER Granting 83 Motion to Vacate re 81 Order Setting Settlement Conference. Confidential Written Evaluation Statements are due by 11/29/2021. Pre-Settlement Conference Telephonic Conference reset for 12/3/2021, at 3:00 PM - Telephonic befor e Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Settlement Conference reset for 12/6/2021, at 9:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3B, before Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 10/14/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Filing 80 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDRED that Defendants motion to seal [ECF No. 64 ] isGRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Howard's motion for investigation, [ECF No. 79 ] is DENIED without prejudice to Howard's ability to assert new claims again st new parties in a new action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Howard's evidentiary objections [ECF No. 71 ] are OVERRULED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties cross-motions for summary judgment [ECF Nos. 58 , 62 ] are GRANTED IN PART and D ENIED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the magistrate judge for a mandatory settlement conference. The parties' obligation to file their proposed joint pretrial order is tolled until 20 days after the settlement conference. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/30/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW) |
Filing 78 ORDER granting 76 Motion to Extend Time to File Reply to 62 Motion for Summary Judgment. Reply due by 2/10/2021; making their 77 reply filed on that date timely. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS) |
Filing 61 ORDER granting 60 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 58 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' response due by 1/6/2021. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/23/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 46 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Dismiss; ORDER denying 35 Motion; Howard's official-capacity, monetary-damages claims are dismissed; the motion is denied in all other respects. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 30 ORDER granting 22 Motion; ORDER granting 24 Motion. Howard's in forma pauperis status shall be revoked. Proof of service due 90 days from date of this order. Payment of filing fees and proof of payment due within 90 days of today 's order. Howard shall have 20 days to furnish the USM-285 Forms to the USM. Howard is to pay $65 for each of the six summonses for which the USM will be attempting service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 3/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: 285 Forms to P, NDOC - JM) (Main Document 30 replaced on 3/10/2020) (JM). Modified distribution on 3/10/2020 (JM). |
Filing 18 ORDER denying 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER granting 14 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Nevada Department of Corrections shall pay to the Clerk of the United States Distri ct Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding month's deposits to Plaintiff's account. Service must be perfected within ninety (90) days from the date of this order. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General's Office shall file a notice advising the Court.Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 8/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: NDOC, Finance - JM) |
Filing 6 ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his updated address with the Court within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/7/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.