Ruben v. Las Vegas NV city govt et al
| Terence E Ruben |
| Las Vegas NV city govt and Texas City TX City Government |
| 2:2017cv01003 |
| April 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 8 Magistrate Judge Ferenbach's report andrecommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that Ruben has until 12/15/17 to file a second amended complaint addressing the issues as discussed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if a second amended complaint is later filed, the Clerk of the Court is directed NOT to issue summons on the second amended complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/7/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 Ruben's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court file 1 -1 the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the amended complaint is due by 6/16/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
