Gallimort v. Dzurenda et al
| Jose Gallimort |
| Attorney General of the State of Nevada and James Dzurenda |
| 2:2017cv01083 |
| April 18, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
2
ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a new petition in a new action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send petitioner the following: (1) two copies of an in forma pauperis application form for a prisoner and one copy of the instructions for the same, (2) two copies of a blank 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition form and one copy of instructions for the same; and (3) the petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner may file a new petition in a new action, but may not file further documents in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Reasonable jurists would not find the dismissal of the improperly-commenced action without prejudice to be debatable or wrong. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/5/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
