Dinkins v. Schinzel
Plaintiff: Kenneth Dinkins
Defendant: Geraldine Schinzel
Case Number: 2:2017cv01089
Filed: April 19, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Assault Libel & Slander
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 165 ORDER Rejecting 164 Report and Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 164 ] is REJECTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Kenneth Dinkins must file a supplemental brief b y August 31, 2022, explaining (1) what post-judgment discovery he has obtained from Schinzel thus far, (2) what information he still seeks through his outstanding discovery requests, and (3) why he needs that information to enforce a writ of execution against Schinzel in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69 and applicable state law. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/12/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LOE)
July 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER granting 160 Motion to Strike 158 Motion for 30 day Extension. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall respond to Plaintiff's outstanding discovery requests, as detailed in this Order, on or before 8/27/2021. No further exte nsions to respond will be granted. Defendant's failure to comply may result in a fine of up to $100 per day for each day after 8/27/2021 that Defendant fails to respond. Defendant shall file a notice certifying that she has complied with this Order upon serving Plaintiff with her discovery responses. If Defendant fails to serve Plaintiff with her discovery responses by the date outlined in this Order, Plaintiff shall file a notice of noncompliance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 7/27/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
March 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 153 ORDER granting 152 Motion for Order to Show Cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Geraldine Schnizel shall show cause why she should not be held in contempt of Court no later than April 23, 2021. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall ensure ser vice of this Order on Geraldine Schnizel by immediately placing a copy of this Order in First Class U.S. Mail to Defendant at the address listed in the Court's CM/ECF system within three (3) Court days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 3/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
September 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 149 DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Kenneth Dinkins against Geraldine Schinzel. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 9/28/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
December 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 145 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 141 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk of Court is directed to STRIKE Defendant Geraldine Schinzel's 70 answer, DISMISS her counterclaims, and ENTER DEFAULT against Schinzel on Dinkins's lone remaining libel per se claim. Plaintiff's 142 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 139 ORDER that the parties shall prepare individual proposed pretrial orders according to the form set forth in Local Rule 16-4 no later than 3/29/2019. The parties shall file either their joint proposed pretrial orders or a status report informing the Court of their inability to agree to a joint proposed pretrial order no later than 4/5/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/12/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 136 ORDER that 109 Dinkins's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Schinzel's counterclaim for public disclosure of private facts; it isDENIED in all other respects.FURTHER ORDERED that 112 Schinzel's Motion for Summary Ju dgment is GRANTED as to Dinkins's defamation by implication, intentional interference with a potential economic advantage, and IIED claims; it is DENIED in all other respects. This order leaves the following claims pending: Dinkins's cl aim for libel per se; and Schinzel's counterclaims for fraud, breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and libel per se.FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REFERRED to a magistrate judge for a MANDATOR Y SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The parties' obligation to file their joint pretrial order is STAYED until 10 days after that settlement conference. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 23, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 128 ORDER that 125 Motion for Sanctions is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant must amend her response to Plaintiff's Request for Production No. 45 to include a description of her inquiry to determine whether responsive documents exist as instructed in this Court's order no later than August 3, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 12, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 124 ORDER that Schinzel's 86 Objections are OVERRULED as moot and Judge Foley's 84 Order Granting in part Dinkins's 66 Motion to Compel is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
June 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 122 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 114 Defendant's Counsel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel is granted, in part, and denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall add the last known address of Defendant Geraldine Schinzel to the civil docket and serve Defendant with a copy of this order at her last known addresses. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
March 19, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 103 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Plaintiff's 87 Motion to Compel and Denying Plaintiff's 96 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER Denying Defendant's 89 Motion for Stay of Magistrate Judge's Order and Denying Plaintiff's 90 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 18, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER Granting Defendant's 78 Motion to Extend Deadlines for Discovery and Designating Expert Witnesses. Discovery due by 4/6/2018. Motions due by 5/7/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
January 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 82 ORDER that Defendant's 37 Motion to Compel and 75 Motion to Compel is Granted in part and Denied in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 1/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
October 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 68 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 23 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim. Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is Denied without prejudice. Defendant's 49 Motion to Amend 21 Counterclaims to Add a Claim forInjunctive Relief is Denied, except that Defendant has until 11/9/2017 to file an Amended Counterclaim. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
September 20, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER Denying without prejudice Plaintiff's 31 Motion for the Issuance of Two Subpoenas Duces Tecum. Plaintiff may again request the issuance ofhis two subpoenas from the Clerk's Office and may provide a copy of this Order as authority for their issuance. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 30 Motion to Quash Unserved Subpoena and Denying Defendant's 34 Motion for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/19/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
September 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part Defendant's 29 Motion for Sanctions, Motion for Protective Order, and Motion for Attorney's Fees. The Court grants Defendant's request for a protective order and denies Defendant's request for sanctions and attorney's fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/15/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dinkins v. Schinzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth Dinkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Geraldine Schinzel
Represented By: Kenneth Leroy Hall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?