Warren v. Cardoza Publishing Company et al
Kenneth Warren |
Avery Cardoza and Cardoza Publishing Company |
2:2017cv01100 |
April 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Jennifer A. Dorsey |
Cam Ferenbach |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 Copyright Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 156 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 134 ORDER Denying 115 Motion to Amend and 118 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 130 ORDER Granting 129 Motion to Extend Time re 110 Pretrial Order (First Request). Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 124 ORDER Granting 122 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 118 Motion for Reconsideration (First Request). Responses due by 7/30/2019. Replies due by 8/13/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 108 ORDER Granting 107 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 106 Order (Fifth Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/19/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/17/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 106 ORDER Granting 105 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 104 Order (Fourth Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/15/2019. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 104 ORDER Granting 103 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 101 Order (Third Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/8/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 101 ORDER Granting 100 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 99 Order (Second Request). Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/25/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 93 ORDER granting 92 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall remove Gary A. Growe, Esq. from the CM/ECF service list in this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 89 ORDER Granting 87 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 85 Order (Second Request). See Order for deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 88 ORDER Granting 86 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 85 ORDER granting 84 Stipulation; Supplemental Briefing due by 4/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/30/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 82 ORDER Granting 81 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 80 Motion Hearing (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.