Zimmerman v. Starbucks Corporation
Kevin Zimmerman |
Starbucks Corporation |
2:2017cv01201 |
April 28, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Gloria M. Navarro |
George Foley |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/14/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 26 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 Intervenor's Motion to Consolidate Cases. All consolidated briefings shall be filed in Case No. 2:17-cv-00304-GMN-GWF. All pending motions to dismiss are denied without prejudice with leave to join in the consolidated briefing to be submitted by Intervenor or, alternatively, to refile upon resolution of Intervenor's motion to dismiss, in accordance with Appendix A to this Order. Intervenor shall have until 4/18/2018 to file its consolidated motion to dismiss. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 25 ORDER that 23 Stipulated Motion and Order to Stay Proceedings and Extend Discovery Deadlines is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 12/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 22 ORDER that 21 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint is granted. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file the amended complaint attached to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. 21 ) as Exhibit 1. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/29/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 14 ORDER that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order not later than October 10, 2017 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 6 ORDER that the clerk of the court shall TRANSFER this case to Chief District Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge George W. Foley, Jr. for all further proceedings; and all future filings in this action shall reference the same numerical portion of the original action's case number, but with the corrected district judge and magistrate judge designation. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/1/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Zimmerman v. Starbucks Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kevin Zimmerman | |
Represented By: | Whitney C Wilcher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.