Weorner v. State of Nevada et al
| Mark W Weorner |
| Clark County Court and State of Nevada |
| 2:2017cv01356 |
| May 11, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| James C. Mahan |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER that 4 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court must file Plaintiff's complaint. The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be gra nted, with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that 7 Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER that Plaintiff must either file an application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $350.00 filing fee, plus the $50.00 administrative fee, within 30 days from the date of this order. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis along with a copy of this order. Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/15/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
