Lucero v. Smith-Palluck Associates Corp.
Plaintiff: David Lucero
Defendant: Smith-Palluck Associates Corp.
Case Number: 2:2017cv01399
Filed: May 16, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Granting 30 Fifth Stipulation to Extend Scheduling Order. Discovery due by 8/6/2018. Motions due by 9/6/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 6/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting 27 Fourth Stipulation for Extension of Time re Scheduling Order Deadlines. Discovery due by 7/6/2018. Motions due by 8/6/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 9/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
April 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER Granting 25 Third Stipulation to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines. Discovery due by 6/8/2018. Motions due by 7/6/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/6/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 4/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
March 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER Granting 21 Stipulation to Extend Scheduling Order Deadlines (Second Request). Discovery due by 5/7/2018. Motions due by 6/6/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
December 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER re 18 Stipulation for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER Granting 14 Stipulation to Extend Discovery. Discovery due by 3/6/2018. Motions due by 4/6/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 5/7/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/1/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
September 18, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER Granting 8 Stipulation to Continue Deadlines. Deadline to object to Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order is 9/15/2017. Deadline to submit Rule 26(f)) Report is 9/15/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 9/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lucero v. Smith-Palluck Associates Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Lucero
Represented By: Sara Khosroabadi
Represented By: Michael Kind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Smith-Palluck Associates Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?