Zimmerman v. Foothill Properties, Inc.,
| Kevin Zimmerman |
| Foothill Properties, Inc., |
| Nevada Attorney General |
| 2:2017cv01450 |
| May 19, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| George Foley |
| Gloria M Navarro |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Civil Case Terminated per #14 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal. (MR) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman. (Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 13 REPLY to Response to #10 Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Intervenor Defendant Nevada Attorney General. (Tucker, Lucas) |
| Filing 12 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman. Response to Objections to R&R due by 11/10/2017. (Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT and Notice of Amended Complaint with Jury Demand against Foothill Properties, Inc.,, filed by Kevin Zimmerman. No changes to parties. Proof of service due by 1/25/2018. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)(Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Intervenor Defendant Nevada Attorney General. Responses due by 10/31/2017. (Attachments: #1 Appendix)(Tucker, Lucas) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this case be DISMISSED without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute. Objections to R&R due by 10/27/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/12/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR) |
Filing 8
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that #7 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time for Service is DENIED, without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
| Filing 7 First MOTION to Extend Time regarding discovery/nondispositive matter (First Request) Extension of Time to Serve re #6 Notice re 4m Dismissal, by Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman. (Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of intent to dismiss pursuant to FRCP 4(m). The * Complaint* in this action was filed on* 5/19/2017.* To date no proper proof of service has been filed as to*Foothill Properties, Inc.,.* FRCP 4(m) dismissal deadline set for 9/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Foothill Properties, Inc., re #1 Complaint. (MR) |
| Case assigned to Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro and Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. (MR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE re: Omnibus Transfer; filed by Kevin Zimmerman. (Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 3 STATEMENT of Corporate Disclosure by Plaintiff Kevin Zimmerman. (Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Kevin Zimmerman that identifies all parties that have an interest in the outcome of this case. Other Affiliate Litigation Management and Financial Services, LLC for Kevin Zimmerman added. . (Wilcher, Whitney) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Foothill Properties, Inc., (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0978-4617528), filed by Kevin Zimmerman. Proof of service due by 8/17/2017. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Wilcher, Whitney) NOTICE of Certificate of Interested Parties requirement: Under Local Rule 7.1-1, a party must immediately file its disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
