Dish Network Corporation v. Lohrengel et al
Plaintiff: Dish Network Corporation
Defendant: Roy Lohrengel and Deborah Pompa
Case Number: 2:2017cv01601
Filed: June 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER granting 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. Debra Pompa is the sole beneficiary to Larry Lohrengel's Dish Network 401(k) plan under the beneficiary designation dated June 26, 2012. Both Roy Lohrengel and Debra Pompa are enjoined from in stituting any further proceeding against Dish Network or any of its subsidiaries arising out of this Interpleader action; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Dish Network be finally discharged from all liability under the plan and dismissed from the actio n. The Clerk of the Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of crossclaimant Debra Pompa and against crossclaimant/cross-defendant Roy Lohrengel and to close this case. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 5/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER denying 30 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 3/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER granting 31 Stipulation to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
March 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 27 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 8/20/2018. Motions due by 9/19/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 10/18/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 3/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
October 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER that the parties meet and confer and file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order within 21 days from the date of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that 18 Motion to Set Scheduling Conference is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 10/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dish Network Corporation v. Lohrengel et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dish Network Corporation
Represented By: William H Payne
Represented By: Mahna Pourshaban
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roy Lohrengel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Deborah Pompa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?