Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, Terra West Collections Group, LLC and The Villas Community Association |
| 2:2017cv01764 |
| June 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Richard F. Boulware |
| Constitutional - State Statute |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
ORDER granting 81 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney Dana Jonathon Nitz withdrawn from the case. Attorney Robert A Riether for Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, added. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER that the stay in this case is LIFTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Villa's 45 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that SFR's 46 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: DENIED as to Deutsche Bank's unjust enrichment claim regarding taxes, insurance or HOA assessments; GRANTED as to all other claims by Deutsche Bank; GRANTED as to SFR's counter-claim against Deutsche Bank; and GRANTED as to SFR 9;s cross-claim against Heck. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court issues declaratory relief in favor of SFR and states the following: that the HOA foreclosure sale and the resulting foreclosure deed are valid as a matter of law; that SFR is the righ tful owner of title to the Property; and that Deutsche Bank and Heck have no legally cognizable interest in the Property at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Deutsche Bank's 47 Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status conference is set in this case for May 17, 2019 at 1:00 PM in LV Courtroom 7C. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/31/2019.(Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - BEL)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER Granting 48 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 45 and 47 Renewed Motions for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/20/2018. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER that this case is STAYED. Plaintiff, Defendant and Cross Claimant, Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice ECF No. 37, 39, 40. All other pending motions are DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Granting 35 Stipulation re Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 2/18/2018. Motions due by 3/30/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that a Discovery Hearing is set for 10/23/2017 at 11:00 AM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. The hearing will be vacated upon the filing of the discovery plan and scheduling order in compliance with Local Rule 26-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Stipulation re 11 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. Plaintiff will post a $500.00 security cost bond with the Clerk of this Court ten (10) days after this Order is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 8/23/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
