Federal National Mortgage Association v. Vegas Property Services, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Federal National Mortgage Association |
Defendant: |
Opulence Condominium Association and Vegas Property Services, Inc. |
Case Number: |
2:2017cv01798 |
Filed: |
June 29, 2017 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada |
Office: |
Las Vegas Office |
Presiding Judge: |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Presiding Judge: |
Peggy A. Leen |
Nature of Suit: |
Real Property: Other |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
July 19, 2019 |
Filing
80
ORDER Joint Status Report or Stipulation of Dismissal due by 7/31/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
May 31, 2019 |
Filing
78
ORDER for Status Report. Stipulation of Dismissal or Status Report due by 6/24/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
April 1, 2019 |
Filing
74
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a corrected image of 73 their status report on or before Friday, 4/5/19. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
March 5, 2019 |
Filing
71
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that on or before 3/29/19, the parties shall file a joint status report regarding the status of, and their intentions regarding, the remaining claims. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/5/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
December 28, 2018 |
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Luis Ayon and Allison Schmidt of Ayon Law, PLLC are substituted in the place of John Wright for Vegas Property Services, Inc, subject to the provisions of LR IA 11-6(b), (c) and (d). Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 12/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
October 25, 2018 |
Filing
59
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 36 defendant Vegas Property Services, Inc.'s motion to dismiss and 49 motion for relief are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 42 plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
May 3, 2018 |
Filing
57
ORDER Granting 51 Stipulation to Allow Vegas Property to Amend Answer and Counterclaim and to Extend Time Re: 49 Motion. Responses due by 5/11/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 5/3/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
April 19, 2018 |
Filing
52
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 43 Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association's Motion to Stay Discovery is GRANTED. The parties shall have 14 days from decision of Fannie Mae's countermotion for summary judgment in which to file a proposed amended discovery plan and scheduling order in the event any claim survives. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 4/19/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
September 22, 2017 |
Filing
16
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED plaintiff shall file its certificate of interested parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 10/6/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
August 29, 2017 |
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 10 Stipulation to Extend Time re 7 MOTION to Dismiss PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT re 1 Complaint. (Responses due by 9/15/2017.) Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/29/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?