U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. v. Crocs, Inc. et al
| U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. |
| Crocs, Inc., Kelly Gray, Kim Lawrie and Erik Rufer |
| 2:2017cv02054 |
| July 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| James C. Mahan |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
CLERK'S JUDGMENT on Attorney Fees in favor of Crocs, Inc., Erik Rufer, Kelly Gray, Kim Lawrie against U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 5/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) (Main Document 87 replaced on 5/29/2019) (JM).
|
|
Filing
82
ORDER that defendants have seven (7) days from the date of this order to either submit a proposed order consistent with the court's ruling on defendants' third motion for sanctions or show cause why additional time is needed to prepare the proposed order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER Re: 66 Motion to Withdraw Attorney. Due to conflicting duties of the Court, the Motion Hearing is continued to 4/23/2019 at 10:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Any response to the motion to withdraw shall be filed no later than 4/15/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Re: 66 Motion to Withdraw Attorney. Motion Hearing set for 4/4/2019 at 02:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Any Response to the Motion is due by 4/3/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Re: Crocs, Inc.'s 53 Third Motion for Sanctions. Crocs shall file a supplemental brief within 14 days from the date of this order discussing the Rule 54-14(b) factors. Plaintiff U.S.A. Dawgs, Inc. shall have seven (7) days thereafter to file a response to the supplemental brief. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER that this action is STAYED pending termination of Plaintiff's bankruptcy proceeding. Plaintiff shall notify the court of the termination of its bankruptcy proceeding within 14 days following termination thereof. Defendant's 44 Motion for Sanctions is Denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's 49 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply is Denied. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 2/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule IA 10-5, the Ninth Circuit' s decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined in this Order with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying without prejudice 14 Motion to Seal. The Clerk's Office is instructed to continue to maintain Docket No. 16 under seal for the time being. Any renewed Motion to Seal is due by 9/28/2017. If no renewed motion is filed by that date the Court may unseal Docket No. 16. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 9/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
