Bynum v. City of Las Vegas et al
| Charlene Bynum |
| Jesse Lee Cesena, City of Las Vegas, City of North Las Vegas, Rodrigo Delara, Michelle Freedman, Jeffrey K. Lytle, Alexander Perez, Jacob Ray and John E. Tonry |
| 2:2017cv02102 |
| August 3, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
243
ORDER Denying as moot 195 Motion for Judgment by CCS Defendants and ORDER Denying 202 Motion for Reconsideration re CCS and LV Defendants by Charlene Bynum. I FURTHER ORDER that, consistent with this order and my order at ECF No. 242 , the clerk of court is instructed to enter final judgment against plaintiff Charlene Bynum and in favor of the following defendants: Correct Care Solutions, LLC, Joe Haplin, Francesca Noce, Joseph Avena, Lara Nares, Christopher Nehls, Haydee Tolentino, Christina Schade, Barbara Buttino, John Darden, Jennifer Swan, City of North Las Vegas, Jacob Ray, Rodrigo Delara, John E. Tonry, Jesse L. Cesena, Alexander Perez, Jeffrey Lytle, John Lansing, Scott Nielsen, and Steven McKlein. I FURTHER ORDER the clerk of court to close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - YAW)
|
|
Filing
241
AMENDED ORDER Accepting 239 Report and Recommendation and Granting 235 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
229
ORDER re 228 Motion for Exception of Attendance Requirement. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any opposition must be filed on or before 2/8/2021. No reply needed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/3/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
227
ORDER granting 224 Motion/Request For Exception Of Attendance Requirement At The Settlement Conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/29/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRS)
|
|
Filing
220
ORDER Vacating 216 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/6/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
214
ORDER granting 211 Stipulation; Re: 203 Motion for Reconsideration, 202 Motion for Reconsideration. Replies due by 1/18/2021. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
207
ORDER granting 206 Stipulation; Re: 203 Motion for Reconsideration, 202 Motion for Reconsideration. Responses due by 12/15/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/24/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER rejecting 199 Joint Pretrial Order; Proposed Joint Pretrial Order that complies with Local Rules 16-3 and 16-4 due by 11/19/2020. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM)
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER granting 167 Motion for Summary Judgment; ORDER granting 171 Motion for Summary Judgment; I FURTHER ORDER that by September 21, 2020, Charlene Bynum and the Las Vegas defendants may file motions for summary judgment on Charlene's state law denial of medical care and loss of consortium claims. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/31/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
184
ORDER granting 183 Stipulation; Re: 171 Motion for Summary Judgment, Replies due by 12/18/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
175
ORDER granting 174 Stipulation; Re: 167 Motion for Summary Judgment, 171 Motion for Summary Judgment, Responses due by 10/30/2019. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/25/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
122
ORDER granting 97 Stipulation; Discovery due by 12/4/2018. Motions due by 1/3/2019. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 2/4/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
96
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on 70 Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Time to Serve Process scheduled for 11:00 AM, 6/12/18, is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 70 Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Time to Serve Process is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
86
ORDER granting 85 Stipulation to Extend Time for Service of Process. Proof of service due by 8/24/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER granting 58 Stipulation; Correct Care Solutions Answer due 3/29/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/22/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER granting 53 Stipulation; Discovery due by 9/4/2018. Motions due by 10/4/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 3/21/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 48 Stipulation; Discovery due by 5/14/2018. Motions due by 6/14/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/16/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
