Stacey et al v. Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC et al
Douglas Stacey, Shellie Stacey and Jeniece Valley |
Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC and Sables, LLC |
2:2017cv02128 |
August 8, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Jennifer A. Dorsey |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC's Motion to Dismiss Complaint [ECF No. 11] is GRANTED. This action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 6/4/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 18 ORDER Granting 17 Stipulation to Extend Time re 11 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint. ( Replies due by 10/4/2017.) Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/28/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 10 ORDER Granting 9 Stipulation to Extend Time. Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC answer due 9/7/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/31/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting 5 Stipulation to Extend Time. Carrington Mortgage Service, LLC answer due 8/31/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/22/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.