Diaz v. Richardson et al
Plaintiff: Carolina Diaz
Defendant: Octaform Systems, Inc., Octaform, Inc. and G. David Richardson
Case Number: 2:2017cv02246
Filed: August 24, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 26 defendants' motion to dismiss be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's first cause of actionhostile work environment arising from harassment based on p laintiff's gender in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000ebe, and the same hereby is, DISMISSED with prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's second, third, fourth, and fifth causes of action be, and the same hereby are, DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/12/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JQC)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER Granting 48 First Stipulation Re: 42 Motion to Extend Time and 43 Emergency Motion for Protective Order. Motion Hearing rescheduled to 1/28/2020 at 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3B before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/14/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
December 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that any opposition to 43 Defendant G. David Richardson and Octaform, Inc.'s Emergency Motion for Protective Order must be filed on or before 12/30/19. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that discovery is stayed pending further order of the court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing, on 42 Plaintiffs Motion to Extend Discovery Deadline and 43 Defendant G. David Richardson and Octaform, Inc.'s Emergency Motion for Protective Order, is scheduled for 2:00 PM, 1/21/2020, in Courtroom 3D. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the early neutral evaluation is VACATED and this case returns to the normal litigation track. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/10/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) Modified on 6/11/2019 to reflect correct signature date (MMM).
May 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 29 Stipulation; The Court VACATES the early neutral evaluation scheduled for 6/26/19. The parties shall file, by 5/23/19, an amended stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/22/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
April 24, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 18 Diaz's motion for default judgment as to Octaform be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 19 Diaz's motion for default judgment as t o Richardson be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 20 Richardson and Octaform's motion to set aside default be, and the same hereby is, GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Richardson and Octaform shall file their responses to the complaint within ten (10) days from the date of this order.Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/24/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz v. Richardson et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carolina Diaz
Represented By: Micheal J Brock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Octaform Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Octaform, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. David Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?