Joseph v. Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC
| Michele Joseph |
| Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC |
| 2:2017cv02265 |
| August 26, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER Granting 49 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 47 Order (First Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/27/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER re: 46 Notice of Settlement. The Court ORDERS the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal no later than August 24, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER. The Court STRIKES Docket Nos. 37 , 38 , 39 , and instructs the parties to refrain from filing discovery documents on the docket in the future absent a Court order that they do so. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER re 30 Stipulation re Protective Order. IT IS ORDERED that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule IA 10-5, the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to any documents filed under seal. To the extent any aspect of the stipulated protective order may conflict with this order or Local Rule IA 10-5, that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby superseded with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/26/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 12 Motion to Dismiss (First Request). Replies due by 12/18/2017. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 12/6/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER Granting 14 Joint Stipulation of Substitution. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 10 Stipulation for Extension of Time re 1 Complaint (First Request). Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC answer due 11/6/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/4/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Joseph v. Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Desert Rock Enterprises II, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michele Joseph | |
| Represented By: | Valerie J. Fatica |
| Represented By: | Robert P Spretnak |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
