Bonham v. Aranas et al
Plaintiff: Bryan P. Bonham
Defendant: Romero Aranas, Brian G, M. Cervas, B. Faulkner, T. Manalang and Tonya Perry
Case Number: 2:2017cv02398
Filed: September 13, 2017
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Presiding Judge: Richard F. Boulware
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 63 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 43 Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 74 Plaintiff's Motion re (15) Motion to Amend/Correct is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 77 Plaintiff's Motion to Extend Time (First Request) re (76) Notice re 4m Dismissal is DENIED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 79 Plaintiff's Motion/Request for Judicial Action is DENIED as moot.The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 5/5/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 83 AMENDED ORDER TO PRODUCE BRYAN P. BONHAM, #60575. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/2/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - ADR)
December 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER TO PRODUCE BRYAN P. BONHAM, #60575. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 12/27/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: USM - ADR)
August 21, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 72 ORDER Denying 42 Motion demanding an inspection for fraud on the Court and Granting 51 Motion to Amend and the Court will consider the information provided therein in ruling on the underlying motion demanding an inspection for fraud on the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
July 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 40 Motion to Amend Complaint to correctly identify Defendant Dr. Gregory Brian. The Clerk's Office shall file on the docket the amended complaint (Docket No. 40 at 5-15). The Attorney General's Office s hall file a notice re service for Dr. Gregory Brian no later than 7/15/2019. The 26 Motion for Service is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/8/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
May 15, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Re: 26 , 27 Motions. Any response shall be filed by 5/20/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/15/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 1 Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Service must be perfected within 90 days from the date of this order, or no later than 4/29/19, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 (m). See Order for further details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/29/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: Chief of Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections, Finance, Attorney General of the State of Nevada - ADR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bonham v. Aranas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Romero Aranas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian G
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Cervas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B. Faulkner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Manalang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tonya Perry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bryan P. Bonham
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?