Bank of New York Mellon v. Southern Highlands Community Association et al
Bank of New York Mellon |
SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC and Southern Highlands Community Association |
2:2017cv02699 |
October 20, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Andrew P. Gordon |
Peggy A. Leen |
Real Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 92 ORDER that the clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of defendants SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, Southern Highlands Community Association, and Alessi & Koenig, LLC and against plaintiff Bank of New York Mellon as Trustee for the C ertificateholders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Trust 2005-84 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-84. The clerk shall then close this case. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/31/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 88 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that defendant Alessi & Koenig, LLC is dismissed from this action for failure to timely serve and to prosecute. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 77 ORDER Granting 75 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 68 Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's Responses due by 11/9/2018. SFR's Replies due by 11/16/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 76 ORDER Granting 74 Second Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's Responses due by 11/9/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 73 ORDER Granting 71 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 65 Motion for Summary Judgment. Bank of New York Mellon's Responses due by 11/2/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/25/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 67 ORDER Granting 66 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 63 Amended Complaint. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC's answer due 10/12/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/11/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 58 ORDER Granting 57 First Stipulation for Extension of Time Re: 44 Motion to Certify a Question of Law to the Nevada Supreme Court. Replies due by 8/20/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 53 ORDER granting 51 Stipulation; Re: 44 Motion. Responses due by 7/30/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 50 ORDER granting 49 Stipulation; Re: 44 Motion. Responses due by 7/23/2018. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 7/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM) |
Filing 28 ORDER that the following discovery plan and scheduling order dates shall apply: Discovery due by 6/15/2018. Motions due by 7/16/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 8/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 13 ORDER Granting 11 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. "BNYM" shall post a $500.00 cost bond with the court on or before 2/2/18. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/2/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.