Duhamel v. Social Security Administration et al
| Darrin Duhamel |
| Nancy A. Berryhill and Social Security Administration |
| 2:2017cv02858 |
| November 14, 2017 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| George Foley |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 72 the Amended Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 68 the Report and Recommendation is REJECTED as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 52 Plaintiff's Amended Motio n for Summary Judgment is DENIED and that 57 the Commissioner's Cross-Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 11/1/2019 (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER Granting 73 Motion to Extend Time Re: 72 Amended Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 10/28/2019. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elayna J. Youchah on 10/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 69 Motion to Extend Time Re: 68 Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 10/7/2019. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Granting 63 Motion to Extend Time re 57 Motion to Remand to Agency (Second Request). Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MR)
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER Granting Plaintiff's 60 Motion for Extension of Time Re: 57 Cross-Motion to Remand. Plaintiff Granted an additional 30 days to file Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 10/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER Granting 55 Motion to Extend Time Re: 52 Motion for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 9/27/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/29/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER granting 48 Unopposed Motion; Amended Motion for Summary Judgment due by 8/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that in the event Plaintiff intends to file an amended motion for summary judgment, the Plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of the issuance of this Order or no later than 7/2/18, file with this Court an amended motion f or summary judgment. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT 41 Defendant's Motion to Vacate Minute Order Setting Briefing Schedule is granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/1/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 13 Plaintiff's Motion for Pro Se Litigant to FileElectronically is granted subject to complying with the procedures within the order. On or before 3/20/18, Plaintiff must provide certification that he has completed the CM/ECF tutorial. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/20/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER Granting 10 Motion to Extend Time. Defendants answer due 3/8/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 2/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
