Iwaniszek v. Pride Transport, Inc.
Stephen J Iwaniszek |
Pride Transport, Inc. |
2:2017cv02918 |
November 21, 2017 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Peggy A. Leen |
James C. Mahan |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the court certifies that any in forma pauperis appeal from the court's order and judgment dismissing this case (ECF Nos. 29 , 30 ) would not be taken in good faith under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/23/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 22 ORDER granting 21 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of the claims in plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 11 ) are dismissed without prejudice but with leave to amend. Amended Complaint deadline: 3/10/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler on 2/17/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HAM) |
Filing 13 ORDERAdopting Report and Recommendations re 6 Report and Recommendation. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 1 plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis be, and the same hereby is, DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within 14 days of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/16/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 10 ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that 8 Plaintiff Steven J. Iwaniszek's Motion to Extend Time is GRANTED. Mr. Iwaniszek shall have until 4/19/19, to file an amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Iwaniszek shall file a certificate of interested parties as required by LR 7.1-1 of the Local Rules of Practice by 4/19/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR) |
Filing 4 SCREENING ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court SHALL FILE 1 -1 Plaintiff Steven J. Iwaniszek's proposedComplaint but SHALL NOT issue summons. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended com plaint by 3/14/19, if Mr. Iwaniszek believes he can correct the noted deficiencies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Iwaniszek shall file a certificate of interested parties as required by LR 7.1-1 of the Local Rules of Practice on or before 3/14/19. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 2/13/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - Encl.: 1 -1 Complaint, Complaint for Employment Discrimination - ADR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Iwaniszek v. Pride Transport, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Stephen J Iwaniszek | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Pride Transport, Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.